PADA EDITORIAL

JAYAPATAKA SWAMI equates "illicit sex with men, women and children," and
"residents of Krishna Loka"
(by his follower, Vidvan Gauranga das: see PADA article no. 5).

Yes, it now seems that Jayapataka swami claims to have a "higher source of
revealed knowledge" than even any of the previous acharyas. He is so
advanced, he has unlocked the mystery of the conjugal love affairs of the
"Krishna loka planet."

Yes. Jayapataka swami now says that his GBC gurus are "like the residents
of Krishna loka," and moreover Jayapataka's spokesman, Jayadvaita swami,
explains that the GBC's gurus are inclined to have: "illicit sex" --with
everyone in the house? Yet some of Jayapataka's gurus are, mercifully,
using condoms so they may not be spreading the AIDS virus?

Jayaptaka is mixing "the residents of Krishna loka" and "the rasa dance"
found there, and his totally abominable, odious, putrid, materially lusty
less-than-dogs (dogs: who do not even have illicit sex with men and
children), who are taking off the clothes of small boys to examine their
behinds, and they want to have sex with small boys? I cannot imagine anyone
in the universe more disgusting that this Jayapataka? How can he juxtapose
these two ideas?

Of course, Jayapataka could not have done this alone. Sridhara Maharaja
helped and said that the (GBCs) gurus should be viewed as "servants of
Radharani" (i.e. as residents of Krishna loka) and that these GBC should
thus be viewed as persons who has "assumed the position of nikunja yuno
(conjugal servants of Krishna on Krishna loka) as was stated in a 1978 GBC
report written by Satsvarupa swami. This GBC report was produced by the
GBC's own order, and it reflected conversations the GBC had with Sridhara
Maharaja in 1978. Of course, these ideas are never supported by Srila
Prabhupada. He says that one cannot equate neophytes (kanisthas) with the
(mahabhagavtas) residents of Krishna loka.

Then, along comes Narayana Maharaja and he says that these same people, who
are inclined to have illicit sex with men, women and children, while posing
as gurus (or they are inclined to VIOLENTLY support those who are thus
engaged as gurus) should now get the higher rasika instructions of
Krishna's gopi gita, a recitation directly from Krishna loka?

The GBC, Sridhara Maharaja, Narayana Maharaja and others, tried to validate
their first error, and they said that these GBC gurus (inclined to have
illicit sex etc.) "gave initiations or diksha," and so now, since we see
that our first wave is bogus, we start a second wave of "re-diskha." That,
despite Srila Prabhupada's warning: "A devotee must have only one
initiating spiritual master because in the scriptures acceptance of more
than one is ALWAYS FORBIDDEN." (Cc Adi 1.35) So, this is also the Gaudiya
Matha's disease, as their first wave of bogus imitation "residents of
Krishna loka" crashed on the beach, they voted in yet another wave, then
another wave, and so on, without ever considering that their first wave was
bogus from square one?

"The relationship of a disciple with the spiritual master is as good as his
relationship with the Supreme Lord." (Cc Adi. 1.44) And according to the
bogus members of the Gaudiya Matha, and their followers like Jayapataka,
this might include: illicit sex with men, women and children?

The real question here is: what planet are these people really from, since it
is not even as elevated as our earth planet? Regular karmi people on this earth
do not think that "a relationship with God and the residents of His planet
equates to: illicit sex with men, women and children"?

This is rather a variation of, perhaps, "Rajneesh," "Rama Krishna mission"
(which dragged all of Bengal to hell says Srila Prabhupada) or the "Radha
Kunda babajis" (they also mix conjugal love of Krishna loka with mundane
lust) and Srila Prabhupada says these babajis are drinking the deadliest of
poisons, that they are really residents of Naraka kunda (hell), not Radha
kunda, and so on.